Algae Is Ancient — And Your Pond Wouldn’t Be the Same Without It

Algae Is Ancient — And Your Pond Wouldn’t Be the Same Without It

Mention algae to most pond owners and the reaction usually isn’t positive.

Algae is blamed for green water, floating mats, unpleasant odors, clogged filters and ugly shorelines. When a bloom gets bad enough, the first question is usually: How do I get rid of it?

But algae deserves a little more credit.

Long before there were fish, frogs, trees, flowering plants or dinosaurs, algae and other photosynthetic microorganisms were already part of life on Earth. And today, algae remains one of the foundations of aquatic ecosystems.

The problem isn’t simply that algae exists.

The problem is when the conditions in a pond allow certain types of algae to grow out of balance.

Just How Old Is Algae?

Very old.

The exact evolutionary history of algae is complicated because “algae” describes a remarkably diverse collection of photosynthetic organisms rather than one simple branch of the tree of life.

Fossil evidence for recognizable eukaryotic algae extends back more than a billion years. One widely accepted fossil red alga, Bangiomorpha, dates to roughly 1.2 billion years ago, while still older fossils have been proposed as red algae. Much later, roughly 650 million years ago, algae became increasingly important primary producers in the oceans.

That transition may have helped support increasingly complex food webs and, eventually, the expansion of animal life.

Then there are cyanobacteria, commonly called blue-green algae. They aren't actually algae in the biological sense—they're bacteria—but their ancient relatives played an enormously important role in Earth's early photosynthetic ecosystems.

In other words, the green stuff growing in a farm pond today represents a biological strategy that has been extraordinarily successful for an almost unimaginable length of time.

Algae Is Where Much of the Aquatic Food Chain Begins

Look at a healthy pond containing bluegill, bass or other fish and it's easy to think of the fish as the main attraction.

Ecologically, however, the story starts much smaller.

Microscopic algae called phytoplankton capture energy from sunlight through photosynthesis. That energy becomes biological material that can be consumed by zooplankton and other small organisms.

Those organisms become food for insects, tiny fish and newly hatched fish. Larger fish eat smaller fish.

The chain might look something like this:

Sunlight → phytoplankton → zooplankton → small fish → larger fish

That is greatly simplified, of course. A real pond contains a complicated food web with thousands of interactions occurring simultaneously.

But algae is often near the beginning.

Remove the primary producers and everything farther up the food chain has less energy available to support it.

Even a Bass Pond Depends on Algae

This connection is especially interesting in a managed fishing pond.

A largemouth bass obviously isn't swimming around eating microscopic algae. Yet much of the food supporting that bass can ultimately be traced back to primary production.

Young bluegill and other forage fish depend heavily on tiny aquatic organisms during their early development. Zooplankton feed on phytoplankton. Aquatic insects and other invertebrates are also connected to primary producers.

Eventually that biological productivity works its way up the food web.

The ten-pound bass may be a long way from the microscopic algae at the beginning of the chain, but the two are still connected.

Algae Also Produces Oxygen

During photosynthesis, algae uses light energy and carbon dioxide to produce carbohydrates and releases oxygen.

During daylight hours, a productive population of phytoplankton can contribute significant oxygen to pond water.

There is an important catch, however.

Algae also respires, and respiration consumes oxygen. At night photosynthesis stops while respiration continues. Heavy algae blooms can therefore contribute to large daily swings in dissolved oxygen.

This is one reason extremely productive ponds can sometimes have plenty of oxygen late in the afternoon but dangerously low oxygen shortly before sunrise.

And when a large algae bloom suddenly dies, bacteria decomposing all that organic material can consume tremendous amounts of oxygen.

So algae can be both an oxygen producer and, indirectly, part of an oxygen problem.

As is so often the case in pond management, balance matters more than simply labeling something good or bad.

So Why Does Algae Have Such a Bad Reputation?

Mostly because pond owners notice algae when there is too much of it.

Nobody calls us to say:

"My pond has a perfectly reasonable population of microscopic phytoplankton. What should I do?"

They call when filamentous algae covers half the pond.

They call when a dense bloom turns the water pea-soup green.

They call when algae collects around docks, covers swimming areas or begins producing odors.

And those are legitimate problems.

Excessive algae can interfere with recreation, create large dissolved-oxygen swings, contribute additional organic matter to bottom sediments and, in the case of certain cyanobacteria, potentially produce toxins.

But those problems don't mean that all algae is bad.

They usually mean that something has pushed the aquatic ecosystem out of balance.

Excessive Algae Is Often a Symptom

One of the most useful ways to think about pond algae is as an indicator.

A severe algae problem is often telling us something about the pond.

There may be excessive phosphorus or nitrogen entering the water. Nutrients may be accumulating in organic bottom sediments. Runoff from the surrounding watershed may be contributing fertilizer, soil, manure or other nutrient sources.

Warm water, abundant sunlight and stagnant conditions can make the situation even more favorable for algae growth.

Simply killing the visible algae doesn't necessarily change any of those conditions.

That's why we prefer to ask another question:

Why is there enough available nutrition to grow this much algae in the first place?

That question usually leads to a better long-term management strategy.

A Pond Without Algae Isn't the Goal

The goal of pond management shouldn't be to create sterile water.

A healthy pond is alive.

It contains algae, bacteria, fungi, zooplankton, insects, plants, fish and countless microorganisms interacting with one another. Nutrients are continually being absorbed, consumed, excreted, decomposed and recycled.

Some algae is part of that system.

In fact, if we somehow removed every algae cell from a pond, we wouldn't have created the perfect pond. We would have removed an important component of the ecosystem.

The better goal is to prevent excessive growth of nuisance species while supporting a diverse and productive aquatic environment.

Algae Isn't the Villain of the Pond

After working with ponds for many years, I've found that algae is easiest to manage when we stop thinking of it simply as an enemy.

Yes, excessive algae can become a serious problem. Certain species can be particularly troublesome, and severe blooms sometimes require intervention.

But algae itself isn't an ecological mistake.

It is ancient.

It captures sunlight and turns that energy into living material. It produces oxygen. It feeds organisms that feed other organisms. And ultimately, it helps support the fish and other aquatic life we value.

Algae has been doing some version of that job for hundreds of millions of years.

So the next time you look across your pond and see a little algae, don't immediately assume something is wrong.

A pond shouldn't be algae-free.

It should be in balance.